Wayfair Sales Tax Case

You may have heard that last month, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the State of South Dakota against online sellers Wayfair, Overstock.com, and Newegg in a case that is commonly referred to as the “The Wayfair Case”. The primary focus of the case centered around a state’s right to force out-of-state sellers, without a physical presence in the state, to comply with their sales tax collection laws.  

Since a 1992 Supreme Court Decision (The Quill Case), states have not been allowed to force companies, without a physical presence in the state, to comply with their sales tax laws.  Quill is an office supply company, who at the time was selling primarily via catalogs, national ads, and telephone calls. The court ruled that Quill was not subject to the North Dakota sales tax laws, because they lacked a physical presence in the State of North Dakota. 

With the passage of time and the continued development of online retailing, 41 states, two territories, and Washington D.C. have all requested the court to review the standard established under Quill.  The Wayfair case focused around South Dakota’s enactment of a“Kill Quill” bill in which the State forced any company with more than $100,000 in sales revenue or 200 “transactions” of taxable products delivered into the state to collect and remit Sales and Use tax. 

Because most States have already enacted a Use tax provision (or something similar) the Wayfair case shouldn’t change the amount of tax required to be paid to any individual state.  It may, however, change who is responsible for making sure the tax is collected and paid.  Use tax provisions generally require the purchaser to voluntarily report and pay the tax.  Wayfair shifts that burden to the seller, which most states believe will ultimately generate more revenue to the state.  Studies have historically shown that Use tax is greatly underreported by purchasers. 

The Wayfair case could fundamentally change how sales and use tax are collected over state lines. The question is, “How will the rules evolve?”  Some states have already adopted the $100,000 and 200 transaction tests used by South Dakota. Both the opinion of the Quill case and in the dissenting opinion of Wayfair suggested that Congress should resolve this issue. 

It is too early to tell how this may ultimately be resolved.  If your organization has out-of-state retail sales, please contact a FMD representative at your earliest convenience to discuss how Wayfair may affect your organization.

Does your business have to begin collecting sales tax on all out-of-state online sales?

You’ve probably heard about the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing state and local governments to impose sales taxes on more out-of-state online sales. The ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. is welcome news for brick-and-mortar retailers, who felt previous rulings gave an unfair advantage to their online competitors. And state and local governments are pleased to potentially be able to collect more sales tax.

But for businesses with out-of-state online sales that haven’t had to collect sales tax from out-of-state customers in the past, the decision brings many questions and concerns.

What the requirements used to be

Even before Wayfair, a state could require an out-of-state business to collect sales tax from its residents on online sales if the business had a “substantial nexus” — or connection — with the state. The nexus requirement is part of the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Previous Supreme Court rulings had found that a physical presence in a state (such as retail outlets, employees or property) was necessary to establish substantial nexus. As a result, some online retailers have already been collecting tax from out-of-state customers, while others have not had to.

What has changed

In Wayfair, South Dakota had enacted a law requiring out-of-state retailers that made at least 200 sales or sales totaling at least $100,000 in the state to collect and remit sales tax. The Supreme Court found that the physical presence rule is “unsound and incorrect,” and that the South Dakota tax satisfies the substantial nexus requirement.

The Court said that the physical presence rule puts businesses with a physical presence at a competitive disadvantage compared with remote sellers that needn’t charge customers for taxes.

In addition, the Court found that the physical presence rule treats sellers differently for arbitrary reasons. A business with a few items of inventory in a small warehouse in a state is subject to sales tax on all of its sales in the state, while a business with a pervasive online presence but no physical presence isn’t subject to the same tax for the sales of the same items.

What the decision means

Wayfair doesn’t necessarily mean that you must immediately begin collecting sales tax on online sales to all of your out-of-state customers. You’ll be required to collect such taxes only if the particular state requires it. Some states already have laws on the books similar to South Dakota’s, but many states will need to revise or enact legislation.

Also keep in mind that the substantial nexus requirement isn’t the only principle in the Commerce Clause doctrine that can invalidate a state tax. The others weren’t argued in Wayfair, but the Court observed that South Dakota’s tax system included several features that seem designed to prevent discrimination against or undue burdens on interstate commerce, such as a prohibition against retroactive application and a safe harbor for taxpayers who do only limited business in the state.

Please contact us with any questions you have about sales tax collection requirements.

© 2018